Tuesday, December 09, 2008

Who Will Blagojevich Take Down With Him?

The complaint against Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, who was arrested by federal agents this morning, is rather stunning. The feds apparently wiretapped his phones and recorded conversations of him and his aides attempting to shop around President-Elect Obama's senate seat to the highest bidder. Not only will this likely mean the end of Blagojevich's political career, but it may take down (or at least cause major headaches for) a number of other politicians and public officials.

For instance, the complaint refers to a "Senate Candidate 5" who appears to have been at least the subject of a bribe solicitation. That person's identity is likely to surface at some point and his/her political future may well hinge on exactly what was said in those recorded conversations.

Even more troubling, from a national political perspective, are the references in the complaint to a plan by Blagojevich to trade the seat for an appointment or some other consideration from the Obama administration. Here's what Patrick Fitzgerald's statement says about that plan:
Over the next couple of days – Election Day and the day after – Blagojevich was captured discussing with Deputy Governor A whether he could obtain a cabinet position, such as Secretary of Health and Human Services or the Department of Energy or various ambassadorships. In a conversation with Harris on November 4, Blagojevich analogized his situation to that of a sports agent shopping a potential free agent to the highest bidder. The day after the election, Harris allegedly suggested to Blagojevich that the President-elect could make him the head of a private foundation.
Later on November 5, Blagojevich said to Advisor A, "I’ve got this thing and it’s [expletive] golden, and, uh, uh, I’m just not giving it up for [expletive] nothing. I’m not gonna do it. And, and I can always use it. I can parachute me there," the affidavit states.

Two days later, in a three-way call with Harris and Advisor B, a consultant in Washington, Blagojevich and the others allegedly discussed the prospect of a three-way deal for the Senate 7 appointment involving an organization called "Change to Win," which is affiliated with various unions including the Service Employees International Union (SEIU).

On November 10, Blagojevich, his wife, Harris, Governor General Counsel, Advisor B and other Washington-based advisors participated at different times in a two-hour phone call in which they allegedly discussed, among other things, a deal involving the SEIU. Harris said they could work out a deal with the union and the President-elect where SEIU could help the President-elect with Blagojevich’s appointment of Senate Candidate 1, while Blagojevich would obtain a position as the National Director of the Change to Win campaign and SEIU would get something favorable from the President-elect in the future. Also during that call, Blagojevich agreed it was unlikely that the President-elect would name him Secretary of Health and Human Services or give him an ambassadorship because of all of the negative publicity surrounding him.

In a conversation with Harris on November 11, the charges state, Blagojevich said he knew that the President-elect wanted Senate Candidate 1 for the open seat but "they’re not willing to give me anything except appreciation. [Expletive] them."
It appears that the Obama camp had no interest in playing ball with Blagojevich, which is good news, but the extent to which there is any political fallout for Obama will depend on exactly what was said and by whom. How exactly did Blagojevich feel out the Obama camp? Who spoke to whom? What exactly was said? Were the conservations recorded? I'm sure that a lot of reporters are already digging for answers to these questions.

For the record, "Senate Candidate 1" may well be Valerie Jarrett. Fitzgerald's statement seems to indicate that this candidate is female, was preferred by Obama, and removed her name from consideration at some point in November. Those facts all fit Jarrett. Indeed--and this is pure speculation on my part--the fact that Jarrett removed her name from consideration so quickly may indicate that Blagojevich's people did indeed approach the Obama camp with some sort of quid-pro-quo proposal and it made everyone in Obama's orbit so uncomfortable that they decided to distance themselves from the whole process.

Whatever the case, anyone who had the misfortune of fielding a call from Blagojevich or his staff is likely to have been snared by the federal wiretap. There are a lot of people--politicians, aides, contributors, union officials--who are in a cold sweat this morning trying to remember exactly what they said in their calls with Blagojevich's office. Blagojevich will not be the only person whose career is threatened by this probe.
Digg!

15 Comments:

Blogger Fraud Guy said...

I was wondering why it was taking Blago so long to appoint a successor to Obama. Now we know he was apparently running an auction and would have appointed himself if no one would meet his price. I only hope that he resigns and allows Quinn to make the appointment, otherwise any choice would be tainted by one of the most corrupt governors my state has ever had. If Blago does choose, any appointee should demur because of the cloud around the governor.

12:02 PM  
Blogger Scott said...

I realize it's highly unlikely, but doesn't the senate have the right to not seat a candidate it believes, for whatever reason, to not be legitimate or up to its standards? [Insert joke here.] I thought that was what Harry Reid had implied in the cases of both Ted Stevens and whoever wins the Minnesota recount, should the results be suspicious.

1:24 PM  
Anonymous SteveIL said...

From a legal perspective, Blagojevich, while he's governor, is still authorized to select Obama's replacement. Can anyone imagine getting the call from Blago saying "I select you to be the next U.S. Senator from Illinois"?

Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan (D) was mulling over impeaching Blagojevich earlier this year. Obama buddy and soon to be ex-state Senate President Emil Jones (D)(Jones is retiring after this session of the General Assembly; his son was "elected" to the seat, but will not be Senate President) said he would block any attempt since he and Blago are such good "friends". I wonder if Jones is one of the "Senate candidates". It wouldn't surprise me.

Chicago politics at its "finest".

1:24 PM  
Blogger Fraud Guy said...

Scott,

You're right.

SteveIL,

You're right also, although it does appear that 1 & 2 didn't want to play, or weren't playing at all, though 5 appears to be in hot water. I have seen some assuming (Ezra Klein) that this is JJJ.

1:47 PM  
Blogger Fraud Guy said...

Sorry,

The speculation on candidate 5 came from A Serwer @ TAPPED, not Mr. Klein, and there may be other possibilities as to their identity.

1:50 PM  
Anonymous SteveIL said...

I have seen some assuming...that this is JJJ.

Fraud Guy, I've heard that too (Ambinder).

1:54 PM  
Blogger Joseph said...

I completely support our Governor, and his fairness throughout this process. He continues to hold himself to nothing but the highest standards and President-Elect Obama would be lucky to have someone such as him serving in the United States Senate.

1:58 PM  
Blogger Joseph said...

My middle name is Sarcasm.

1:59 PM  
Blogger mls said...

Scott asks an interesting question. The Constitution gives the Senate the power to judge the qualifications and elections of tis members. I am not sure that this gives the Senate the power to refuse to seat someone who was appointed pursuant to the 17th Amendment, even if the appointment were the result of some sort of corrupt bargain. However, if the appointed Senator him or herself were guilty of corruption, the Senate could proceed under the Displinary Clause.

3:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Obama is handling this unfortunate situation with his usual calm and so the question the right-wing crazies will be asking is ...

"What did the President-elect not know and when can we pretend that he did?"

- Bob

7:13 PM  
Blogger mls said...

Another interesting question relates to Senator Durbin's proposal that the Illinois legislature pass a new law to establish a special election for the vacant Senate seat. Under current Illinois law, the Governor is empowered to appoint a temporary replacement until the next general election (which in this case would occur in 2010).

If the Illinois legislature acts before the Governor makes an appointment, I would guess that it can strip him of the power to make temporary appointments. But if the Governor acts first, I don't see how the legislature can deprive his appointee of the Senate seat (although one can imagine a huge row in the Senate about it). The issue of whether the legislature could change the date of the special election after the temporary appointment was made would be a question of first impression, as far as I know.

7:29 PM  
Blogger Fraud Guy said...

mls,

It's even more fun, as the governor can sit on a bill for up to 60 days before signing it, which would take it to the next session, with different players in the legislature if he then decided to veto it.

If they just impeach him, however, and remove him from office, they could either let the Lt. Governor (Quinn) make the appointment (and he is not named in the indictment, either as a player or actor), or then pass the law and have Quinn sign it.

Some have commented on why Illinois seems to breed so many corrupt politicians. It may have to do with the fact that we have the densest political structure (over 4000 local political bodies, IIRC), often with overlapping jurisdictions. For example, I am covered by the local village, township, county, park district, two school districts (elementary and h.s.), sanitation district, + a few I'm sure I missed. With such a high density of politicians, I feel that you're more likely to get the fraudulent outliers involved.

10:18 AM  
Blogger Jacob said...

Unbelievable. One can understand now why the United States moved away from strong party politics, especially when it comes to nominations.

10:20 AM  
Blogger mls said...

Fraud Guy- if the General Assembly passes a bill now and the Governor vetoes it, can it be overridden in the next session? Or would they have to start over?

12:12 PM  
Blogger Fraud Guy said...

mls,

The report I read seems to believe so, but I am not sure. In either case, the most certain solutions they have (impeach, let Quinn pick; or impeach, then pass/Quinn sign special election law) to make the elections happen should be easier. The former is cleaner, as it follows the current rule, then prevents future shenanigans. I am not one in favor of on the fly electoral reorginization. However, since Quinn is not a favorite of much of the Democratic establishment in Illinois (IIRC being a bit of a gadfly from when he acted as a public guardian in Cook County), they may push for the election option strongly.

2:22 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home