The Sad Demise of Joe Lieberman
It's amazing how circumstances have conspired to make Joe Lieberman a chief surrogate for those who would stand in the way of the very ideas he spent his life fighting for. I've never much liked Joe Lieberman, but at least once upon a time he was an advocate for progressive economic and social policies, things like universal health care, fairness in the tax code, sensible regulation, a woman's right to choose, civil rights, etc.
When Lieberman decided to cross parties and endorse John McCain back in December of 2007, he justified his action by saying that he considers McCain "the most capable to be commander in chief on day one of his administration, and the most capable of uniting the country so that we can prevail against Islamic extremism." In other words, Lieberman essentially conceded that his decision was all about foreign policy. He might disagree with McCain on most domestic policy issues, but his top priority at this point was the War on Terror.
I wonder what Lieberman would have thought that day if he had been told that less than a year later, he would be stumping in Florida for a half-term Alaskan governor with no foreign policy experience (or knowledge) and far right views on social issues, and that he would be doing so in an environment in which differences over economic policy have become far more significant and pronounced than differences over foreign policy.
This morning in Clearwater, Florida, Lieberman introduced Sarah Palin at a campaign rally. Here's Michael Crowley at TNR:
Not only that, but it's unlikely Lieberman and Palin share even a single similar view on any major domestic policy issue. Yet here we have Lieberman trying to convince wary Jewish voters in Florida to vote for a painfully inexperienced and unknowledgeable christian fundamentalist.
And all this is happening amidst an economic crisis the likes of which America hasn't experienced in many decades. An election that Lieberman thought would be about foreign policy has become almost exclusively about domestic policy. And yet Lieberman is put himself in a position where he is stumping for the ticket that shares almost none of his views on the transcendent issues of the day.
Regardless of how this election turns out, Lieberman will fade into history as a much diminished figure, a man who placed personal allegiances ahead of core beliefs and ended up becoming a spokesman for the very ideas he spent most of his career fighting against. What a sad, pathetic figure.
When Lieberman decided to cross parties and endorse John McCain back in December of 2007, he justified his action by saying that he considers McCain "the most capable to be commander in chief on day one of his administration, and the most capable of uniting the country so that we can prevail against Islamic extremism." In other words, Lieberman essentially conceded that his decision was all about foreign policy. He might disagree with McCain on most domestic policy issues, but his top priority at this point was the War on Terror.
I wonder what Lieberman would have thought that day if he had been told that less than a year later, he would be stumping in Florida for a half-term Alaskan governor with no foreign policy experience (or knowledge) and far right views on social issues, and that he would be doing so in an environment in which differences over economic policy have become far more significant and pronounced than differences over foreign policy.
This morning in Clearwater, Florida, Lieberman introduced Sarah Palin at a campaign rally. Here's Michael Crowley at TNR:
It was jarring, however, to hear Lieberman's full-throated endorsement of Sarah Palin, a woman with whom he has no prior relationship, and whose policy credentials you have to think the wonky 20-year Senator would find suspect in any other context.It really is sad. I have no doubt in my mind that Lieberman considers this woman to be a joke. No one as manifestly unqualified to be president has ever come this close to the White House. Indeed, Lieberman's stated rationale for supporting John McCain in the first place only underscores the absurdity of putting Palin on a national ticket.
"She's so strong, she's so capable, she's so competent," Lieberman told the cheering crowd. Emphasizing her "faith," he added that she is someone who "with your help--and God's help--will be the next vice president of the United States." More big cheers.
The religiousity continued when Palin bounded onstage. She commented right away on the number of American flags in the crowd, declaring: "God bless America--you guys get it!"
Not only that, but it's unlikely Lieberman and Palin share even a single similar view on any major domestic policy issue. Yet here we have Lieberman trying to convince wary Jewish voters in Florida to vote for a painfully inexperienced and unknowledgeable christian fundamentalist.
And all this is happening amidst an economic crisis the likes of which America hasn't experienced in many decades. An election that Lieberman thought would be about foreign policy has become almost exclusively about domestic policy. And yet Lieberman is put himself in a position where he is stumping for the ticket that shares almost none of his views on the transcendent issues of the day.
Regardless of how this election turns out, Lieberman will fade into history as a much diminished figure, a man who placed personal allegiances ahead of core beliefs and ended up becoming a spokesman for the very ideas he spent most of his career fighting against. What a sad, pathetic figure.



12 Comments:
There shouldn't be any surprise. Lieberman has for all practical purposes joined the Republican party and is acting like any good Republican partisan would.
Besides wishing to rid the world of Muslims, or more generally, of threats to Israel's existence, Lieberman seems no longer to possess core beliefs.
It is beyond me that Lieberman would choose to degrade himself to this point during the holiest time of year for Jews. This is supposed to be a time of contemplation and goodness, a time to make amends with anyone you may have hurt in any way during the past year.
I know exactly what Joe Lieberman must really think of Palin, and, Joe Lieberman knows how dangerous and venal is John McCain. I'm stunned.
Hard to believe how far Joe has sunk. I remain convinced this this is about Israel and little else. His protestations that Sarah is qualified is as disengenuous as McCain's claim that he consults her regularly on foreign policy issues. Such lies.
Pathetic is not a term I would use to describe Lieberman. Judas Goat would seem to be more apt.
I'm with you on this one. When Lieberman began supporting McCain I could see that as personal and principled. (I didn't actually, but I could.) What he's doing now is, as you said, sad, pathetic hackery in it's most undisguised form.
The Senator from Likud's prospects in the senate appear pretty bleak at the moment. If the Democrats perform as expected he is certain to be kicked out of the caucus and stripped of his chairmanships. His popularity is also in the tank back in Connecticut. A position in the McCain cabinet is his last best out and that will obviously require some first rate prostituting on the campaign trail...
Obituary pre 2006:
Ran as Vice President on the Democratic ticket for 2000. Also ran in the Democratic primaries of 2004.
Obit post 2006:
Most famous for selling his soul to the devil in his lying, deceitful defense of his BFF John McCain. Slinked over to the Republican side of the aisle in 2009, and was voted out of office in a record Connecticut Senate race landslide.
He lived the rest of his life in Sedona, Arizona, where he and his BFF told stories of the "good ol days" in their alternative universe memories.
It is somewhat befitting that both
Lieberman and McCain will sink into their self generated slime together . two putrid politicians whose whole careers have been about them rather than actual service and who have repeatedly backstabbed those who stood in the way of their shameless
self-promotion. He who lives by the sword dies by the sword
He might disagree with McCain on most domestic policy issues, but his top priority at this point was the War on Terror....no. His priority is Israel...and it's really not all that difficult to see or say.
Richard
Lieberman was scummy a few years ago when he promised Obama that he would never run as an independent if he lost the Dem primary in 2006.
Liberman lost - then he brooke his promise.
I don't understand the defense of Lieberman as a 'social issue' progressive. I am a life-long Democrat who has voted for every Democratic Presidential candidate since Humphrey -- just missed out on the 18yr old vote Amendment that would have let me vote for LBJ -- and hasn't voted for a Republican since Thatcher Longstreth ran against Frank Rizzo for mayor of Philly. But, in 2000 I repeatedly condemned PFAW for not giving Lieberman the same scrutiny they gave the Republicans.
Lieberman was pro-censorship -- remember the fiss about record labeling -- and used the 'religious' and 'family values' card in his campaigning as much as Bush did.
Certainly he is not anti-choice, is not an extremist, but he's no progressive either.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home