Monday, August 11, 2008

The One-Term Pledge: Obama campaign needs to have a response ready

(updated below)

John McCain's advisers are dropping hints that McCain may use the occasion of his convention speech to make a pledge to serve only one term as president. If he does, it would be a shrewd move politically. The overall dynamics of this race do not favor McCain, and he really does need to start thinking outside the box if he wants to change those dynamics.

Moreover, given how terrible McCain is at delivering speeches, there's a real chance that the headlines the day after his convention speech will all focus on his lackluster performance, particularly in comparison to Obama's performance the week prior. If that's the case, it may well blunt his momentum coming out of the convention.

But if McCain uses his speech to make a one term pledge, that's all anyone will talk about for days. It will trigger an orgy of adulatory press coverage for McCain. The Beltway press corps will absolutely trip over themselves to heap praise on McCain for taking such a bold step and putting the "well-being of his country ahead of his own political ambitions," and Obama will be put on the defensive almost immediately.

So the Obama team really needs to be prepared to deal with this contingency should it arise. They should be ready to hammer home a few key talking points over and over again:

First, and most importantly, they should point out that--by taking that pledge--McCain renders himself a lame duck before his presidency even starts. When you're not running for re-election, your influence is greatly diminished. Just look at all the amazing accomplishments of George W. Bush's second term. He's now totally irrelevant and has to slap beach volleyball players in the butt to even make the news. As McCain himself said in January when asked about making such a pledge, when you do so "then you’re the lame duck, you’re quacking on Inauguration Day."

Second, the Obama camp should point out that it is completely unrealistic to think that you can accomplish all of the reforms this country needs in just one term. Only someone who plans on pursuing the status quo would make such a pledge.

And finally, I would point out what a gimmick and a sign of desperation the pledge is. McCain himself has previously ruled out making such a pledge. What changed? Obviously, he realized that he needed to do something dramatic and attention grabbing to have any shot at winning. This is a move driven by ambition, not selfless love of country.

I'm not sure how effective any of those talking points would be, but whatever they end up doing, I just hope the Obama camp isn't caught flat-footed.

UPDATE: Isaac Chotiner at The New Republic questions my assumption that making a one-term pledge would be a shrewd political move by McCain. He writes:
Ramesh Ponnuru has argued this case before, and maybe, as the Anonymous Liberal predicts, the press will focus on McCain's selflessness were he to take the pledge. But it still does not follow that anyone will vote for the guy because he only plans to serve one term. Ponnuru also thinks that the pledge would help McCain's maverick, above-politics image, and I would agree...if McCain were fifty years old. But he is in his seventies. Making this pledge will just lead to a whole slew of stories about his age, which may cause people to think twice about giving him even a single term. That speculation is probably unfair, however: It is hard to imagine that the move would shift any votes one way or another.
Perhaps, but I stand by my original assumption. Everyone already knows that McCain is old. If anything, I think a one-term pledge would reassure those voters who find his age concerning that he's not going to hang around until he's 80 and possibly senile (like Reagan increasingly was toward the end of his presidency). And, of course, if McCain takes the pledge, he and his surrogates are going to frame it much differently. They're going to argue (in every television ad and interview) that McCain is taking the pledge so that he can focus exclusively on solving our nation's problems and not get bogged down in "politics as usual." That will be a powerful message and it will absolutely captivate the press corps. McCain's supporters will make the case that his campaign is every bit as historic as Obama's and they'll try to co-opt Obama's message of rising above "the politics of old." Again, if Obama responds quickly and effectively, I think he can minimize the political benefit to McCain of making such a pledge, but I still think it would be a smart move by McCain.
Digg!

8 Comments:

Blogger UncommonSense said...

I think the perfect response from Obama would be:

"If Senator McCain believes he has nothing to offer America beyond one term in office, I applaud his candor in making that admission up front.

The problems this country faces after eight years of the Bush presidency are significant, and require a long-term plan and commitment from the next president. I am committed to spending the next eight years doing everything I can to get American back on the right track.

If Senator McCain does not have the endurance to run this race as a marathon, rather than as a sprint, that is something the American people have a right to know as they step into the voting booth on November 4th."

12:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree they ought to be ready. How about something from Obama like "John McCain and I are moving closer to agreement - he doesn't think he is a good bet for two terms, and I don't think he is the better choice even for one"?

As to the instant lame-duck - I think it's true, but remember, McCain is already a very odd bird. One term of McCain combined with a palatable VP pick might actually energize the disaffected Rep base.

And for a lot of the country, the one-term pledge would signal an end to politics as usual in a way that Obama would be pressed to criticize. McCain, whether in one term or two, was always likely to cut deals with Congressional Dems - as a one-timer, that is even more likely. For the many folks who equate bipartisanship with virtue, this will be great news.

Well. I think the "geez, not even McCain has confidence in his Presidency" line could work. I score the "self-promotion" attack as zero; considering the source (Mr. Personalized Presidential Seal), make that a negative 20.

The "Can't get it all done in four years charge" invites the obvious riposte that it can't all be done in eight, either - McCain can at least set us on a sensible path. Just for example, folks who think there is no reason to chose between conserving and drilling when we can do both (a poll majority) might figure four years of commons sense beats eight years of disconnect.

OK - I think Obama needs to highlight McCain's lack of confidence and run against the VP pick, who is obviously a key part of the deal. Why wait for the inauguration when he can make McCain a lame duck in Sept 2008?

Tom Maguire

12:18 PM  
Blogger A.L. said...

Tom,

Just to be clear, I was putting myself in the shoes of the Obama camp and talking from a purely strategic standpoint. The reality is, if McCain were to win (God forbid), I'd much prefer a McCain who had made a one-term pledge to a McCain who hadn't. I think a one-term McCain would govern much better and be much more willing to make constructive legislative compromises, particularly on fiscal issues where Republican anti-tax orthodoxy has put the whole country in a real bind.

12:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just read off a list of all the still-serving Republicans who broke a term-limits pledge to do so.

There's no reason to take his word for it, unless he knows he's physically not up for it, and then he shouldn't run at all. (Pace FDR.)

Davis X. Machina

6:54 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Easy.

Without concern over re-election, there's no mechanisms for accountability to the American people.

McCain could do whatever he wanted without fear of being punished at the polls.

Keep troops in Iraq? Check.
Cut corporate taxes? Check.
Deficit spend? Check.
Do nothing? If he wants.

If we don't like it, what's to stop him from doing it (or not doing it) anyway?

Re-election is the lifeblood of representative democracy, because it's the one chance we have to really express our opinion.

10:41 AM  
Anonymous Ron E. said...

McCain would be insane to make this pledge. He might as well tape a big sign to his back that reads, "Too old for the job." While it might make David Broder swoon, I have to think a one term pledge would only serve to increase voter concerns over McCain's age and would be a net vote loser.

11:00 AM  
Anonymous Fred App said...

I can't see how a one-term pledge helps McCain at all. It all reinforces the idea that he's too old to reasonably be expected to serve more than four years. It makes him an immediate lame duck, which calls into question how effective he actually can be. It means that he basically won't be hanging around long enough to fix any of the major problems facing the country. And it puts increased emphasis on his VP pick, who would be presumed to be his successor, which in term takes the focus off McCain -- almost making him his own second fiddle. In essence, it would force McCain to argue that not only should he be president, but that, in four years, Pawlenty or Romney or whomever should be president, too. I don't see how that's an easier argument.

2:08 PM  
Anonymous bjohnm said...

I have to agree with AL on this one. The press is looking for an excuse to "swoon," and anything like this would give them something to talk about. So they would take it up and run with it. Making a huge positive idea.

I think it might also energize a lot of the far right, not so enthralled with McCain. This would give Dobson his excuse (as if he needed one) to come out in support of McCain. They can bite their tongues and support the guy for four years.

And like it or not, some people have this underlying sense that McCain deserves a term. He's served in the military, been a POW, served in Congress, for the Presidency several times, and his age will prevent another run. So again, there are some tongue biters that might vote for him on this basis.

8:58 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home