Dispatches from Up-is-Down World
There are things that you just wouldn't know unless you read right-wing blogs. For instance, did you know Barack Obama is a "Gaffe Machine"? That's a common theme on right-wing blogs. For example, in this fairly typical post at Powerline (entitled "Has the Gaffe Machine Gone Too Far?") John Hindraker writes:
Now, if you just read right wing blogs like Powerline, you might come to the conclusion that Obama is some sort of drooling ignoramus who is constantly putting his foot in his mouth and that his opponent is a polished speaker who is well-versed on all policy issues and never makes gaffes.
Luckily we live in the digital age, so voters can see and hear the candidates themselves and don't have to rely on John Hindraker's analysis. But it still amazes me that people like him are willing to sit there and tell you that up-is-down and black-is-white.
I can understand efforts by Republicans to push certain narratives, i.e., that Obama is too inexperienced or too liberal or even too foreign (as despicable as that narrative is). I can see people being persuaded by those attacks. But do they really think they're going to convince people that Obama is a "gaffe-machine" or an ignoramus, especially when he's running against John McCain and running to succeed George Bush?
For starters, Obama is objectively a very intelligent person. He was the president of the Harvard Law Review and he's written several well-received books (by himself, without a ghost-writer). He was also a constitutional law professor at a top law school. Not only that, but he clearly comes across as being thoughtful and intelligent in interviews and speeches, particularly when compared to George Bush, our sitting president. There's just no way that an "Obama as idiot" narrative will ever gain even the slightest bit of traction.
The same is true of the "Obama as gaffe machine" narrative. Even before John McCain committed one of the worst gaffes of all time yesterday, he had made a number of embarassing misstatements on a whole host of topics. And the man can't deliver a speech to save his life. And again, the frame of reference here is George Bush, our sitting president, who has committed so many gaffes over the last eight years that most people long ago stopped even noting them.
It's fine, though. If right-wing bloggers want to waste their time trying to push these hopeless narratives, more power to them. At least it will keep them busy.
Barack Obama without a teleprompter is an accident waiting to happen. Sometimes he reveals his ignorance of history, sometimes he stumbles incoherently, and sometimes he blurts out what he really believes.Later in the post he questions Obama's intelligence and concludes that Obama is "unqualified to be a middle-manager in a well-run company, let alone President."
Now, if you just read right wing blogs like Powerline, you might come to the conclusion that Obama is some sort of drooling ignoramus who is constantly putting his foot in his mouth and that his opponent is a polished speaker who is well-versed on all policy issues and never makes gaffes.
Luckily we live in the digital age, so voters can see and hear the candidates themselves and don't have to rely on John Hindraker's analysis. But it still amazes me that people like him are willing to sit there and tell you that up-is-down and black-is-white.
I can understand efforts by Republicans to push certain narratives, i.e., that Obama is too inexperienced or too liberal or even too foreign (as despicable as that narrative is). I can see people being persuaded by those attacks. But do they really think they're going to convince people that Obama is a "gaffe-machine" or an ignoramus, especially when he's running against John McCain and running to succeed George Bush?
For starters, Obama is objectively a very intelligent person. He was the president of the Harvard Law Review and he's written several well-received books (by himself, without a ghost-writer). He was also a constitutional law professor at a top law school. Not only that, but he clearly comes across as being thoughtful and intelligent in interviews and speeches, particularly when compared to George Bush, our sitting president. There's just no way that an "Obama as idiot" narrative will ever gain even the slightest bit of traction.
The same is true of the "Obama as gaffe machine" narrative. Even before John McCain committed one of the worst gaffes of all time yesterday, he had made a number of embarassing misstatements on a whole host of topics. And the man can't deliver a speech to save his life. And again, the frame of reference here is George Bush, our sitting president, who has committed so many gaffes over the last eight years that most people long ago stopped even noting them.
It's fine, though. If right-wing bloggers want to waste their time trying to push these hopeless narratives, more power to them. At least it will keep them busy.



8 Comments:
These clowns have been pushing this teleprompter meme for months.
I deconstructed it in a couple of posts on my blog, but the upshot is this:
They are trying to turn something entirely ordinary into a controversy. Obama uses a teleprompter!
But everybody who gives long speeches, and who has access to a teleprompter, uses one. That's why there are teleprompters.
And those who don't use teleprompters for long speeches use note cards.
The only politician I know who doesn't need to use either is Bill Clinton. He can extemporize at great length on intricate policy issues without notes, but he is unique in this regard.
Heck, John McCain reads off of note cards during his town-hall meetings. And, he does it poorly.
Making a big deal about Obama using a teleprompter during a speech is like making a big deal about using an umbrella when it rains.
They got nuthin but smears and fears, and that reality is becoming unavoidable.
The point of the post you linked to is that Obama's statement equating the Russian invasion of Georgia and our invasion of Iraq was a gaffe. It is a polemical post (not unlike the stuff you write), but the stuff about Obama being a "gaffe machine" is an assumption, not the thrust of the argument.
Whether or not Obama is a "gaffe machine" is an entirely different issue than whether he is intelligent. You can be smart and make gaffes (look at Phil Gramm).
Maybe Obama isn't particularly prone to gaffes, but his campaign seems to be concerned about it. Why else would they have declined McCain's invitation to appear to town halls?
MLS, I realize the main focus of the Powerline post was about Obama's Georgia comment (which was perfectly innocuous), but that was hardly the only point. Believe it or not, I read Powerline regularly and this is just another in a long line of posts trying to paint Obama both as a "gaffe machine" and as dumb generally.
If you don't believe me, go read through their archives. My point is that the narratives they're trying to build make no sense and have no hope of catching on.
Oh c'mon AL, we all know that most right-wingers, especially those of the keyboard warrior variety, live in an alternate reality. Certainly not the real world you and I and most normal people inhabit.
Of course people like you and me won't buy the crap Powerline is selling, AL. But we're not the target audience. Get Rush and O'Reilly to repeat this junk enough times and a certain percentage of the ill informed "independent" voters will swallow it and vote accordingly.
Believe it or not, I read Powerline regularly
I'm sorry, I don't know how you deal with it.
Hindraker would make a facinating case study. It'd be interesting to get into his head John Malcovich style just to have an understanding of how he sees the world. Just the othre day he was defending McCain and his houses by saying he (Hinder) doesn't know how many ties he has. He can't possibly believe that that is a convinicing argument.
Two points:
1. Hindraker also tried to defend McCain's houses comment by saying that if he were in McCain's shoes and a reporter asked him how many ties he had, he'd have to ask his wife ... because ties are just like multimillion-dollar houses.
2. I'm glad to let the wingers paint Obama as a gaffe machine. The lower their expectations of him, the greater their surprise in the debates.
I would hope that Biden can state in plain language what a lot of us have been saying for a while. Hell, he doesn't even have to talk. He could just politely ask for an Internet connection and a projection screen? Show the YouTube clips and McCain just might implode on impact.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home