The First Lady Gambit
There comes a point in every presidential election cycle, usually shortly after the Democratic party has selected its nominee, when the Republican Party and its army of surrogates make a concerted effort to paint the wife of the Democratic nominee as some sort of un-American elitist weirdo. It's always the same thing. We saw it with Kitty Dukakis, with Hillary Clinton, with Teresa Heinz Kerry, and we even saw the beginnings of such an effort with Howard Dean's wife, Judith Steinberg, when it looked like Dean was going to run away with the nomination in late 2003. The current target, of course, is Michelle Obama, who right-wing radio hosts, bloggers, and pundits are all eager to paint as some sort of bitter, America-hating black militant.
Commenting on Michelle Obama's appearance on The View today, the always-obnoxious Lisa Schiffren condescendingly writes that Obama "is pretty good at seeming like a regular gal. In this she has proved a much quicker study than Hillary, who took a decade plus to soften up and learn to hide her contempt for small talk."
Yuval Levin of the National Review recently penned an article about Michelle Obama entitled "America's Unhappiest Millionaire" which describes her as "bitter" and "relentlessly negative."
She writes:
Of course, this entire caricature is based on the slimmest of evidence (if you can even call it that). As you quickly notice when you read or listen to any of these rants, they all cite the same two or three quotes, all of which are taken out of context. It's like trying to make the case that Tiger Woods is a crummy golfer by pointing to two or three missed puts.
If you actually watch Michelle Obama in any of her public appearance (of which she does several each day), it's pretty clear that she's not some bitter, angry zealot. Quite the opposite. She's always smiling and always cheerfully campaigning on behalf of her husband, echoing his message of hope and change. She seems quite content with her life, and her love for her husband and two daughters is readily apparent.
And the attempt to brand her as a millionaire elitist is especially galling. She's someone who grew up in a working-class household and managed to put herself through school with loans and scholarships (as did her husband). She and her husband are far less wealthy than the typical presidential couple. They barely qualify as millionaires and most of that money came in the last few years as a result of Obama's book sales. By contrast, Cindy McCain grew up as the only child to extremely affluent parents and is now extravagantly wealthy.
But we have to endure the same garbage every four years. The wives of the Republican candidates are largely ignored, and no matter how wealthy they are or how many skeletons they have in their closets, they're presumed to be "regular folk." The wives of the Democratic nominees, however, are invariably demonized for completely trivial statements and misdeeds and treated as if they are aliens from Mars. Welcome to American politics.
Commenting on Michelle Obama's appearance on The View today, the always-obnoxious Lisa Schiffren condescendingly writes that Obama "is pretty good at seeming like a regular gal. In this she has proved a much quicker study than Hillary, who took a decade plus to soften up and learn to hide her contempt for small talk."
Yuval Levin of the National Review recently penned an article about Michelle Obama entitled "America's Unhappiest Millionaire" which describes her as "bitter" and "relentlessly negative."
She writes:
Her listeners have to wonder exactly what she has in mind by “regular folks” when Mrs. Obama says that after completing their Ivy League undergraduate and graduate educations, she and her husband “found ourselves in a position like most young couples, with our PhDs and JDs and MPHs and LMNOPs, all those wonderful degrees, all mired in debt. We had not paid off our loan debt until just a few years ago.” But whether you are highly educated multi-millionaires or not, in Michelle Obama’s America, chances are you’re afraid, isolated, and hopeless.And this is all very tame compared to the vitriol currently spewing out of right-wing radio land, where you get the impression that Michelle Obama is the reincarnation of Malcolm X.
Of course, this entire caricature is based on the slimmest of evidence (if you can even call it that). As you quickly notice when you read or listen to any of these rants, they all cite the same two or three quotes, all of which are taken out of context. It's like trying to make the case that Tiger Woods is a crummy golfer by pointing to two or three missed puts.
If you actually watch Michelle Obama in any of her public appearance (of which she does several each day), it's pretty clear that she's not some bitter, angry zealot. Quite the opposite. She's always smiling and always cheerfully campaigning on behalf of her husband, echoing his message of hope and change. She seems quite content with her life, and her love for her husband and two daughters is readily apparent.
And the attempt to brand her as a millionaire elitist is especially galling. She's someone who grew up in a working-class household and managed to put herself through school with loans and scholarships (as did her husband). She and her husband are far less wealthy than the typical presidential couple. They barely qualify as millionaires and most of that money came in the last few years as a result of Obama's book sales. By contrast, Cindy McCain grew up as the only child to extremely affluent parents and is now extravagantly wealthy.
But we have to endure the same garbage every four years. The wives of the Republican candidates are largely ignored, and no matter how wealthy they are or how many skeletons they have in their closets, they're presumed to be "regular folk." The wives of the Democratic nominees, however, are invariably demonized for completely trivial statements and misdeeds and treated as if they are aliens from Mars. Welcome to American politics.



7 Comments:
How much does the Obama campaign pay you to write this propaganda?
Just curious.
To what are you objecting, anonymous? Or are you just getting free "points" at JohnMcCain.com under their "please be a troll" program?
What's amazing is that there isn't a big left-wing movement to say
"Cindy McCain is:
(a) a born-rich beer heiress
(b) who was McCain's mistress when he was married to his first wife
(c) who was addicted to drugs
(d) to the point that she STOLE them from her charity,
(e) which is an obvious crime
(f) for which she was never prosecuted
(g) because John McCain's people interceded
Of course, the problem is the (a)-(f) all are absolute, admitted facts, and (g) is pretty close to one.
In case you still need convincing about the decency gap between the two sides, the treatment of the wives is the ultimate evidence.
Michelle Obama is fantastic ... as a nation, we'd be very lucky to have her.
True enough but it ain't gonna change. Tripe like you quote is meant for tripe eaters and tripe eaters don't change their diets.
Often in debates with Hillary haters I would ask them to tell me about their last one on one with her. This would result in a perplexed look on my opponents face which was always followed up with a " I never said I ever met her!!" And then I made the obvious point: if they have no first hand experience with Clinton then all they have is what other people have told them. Those other people usually have no first hand experience either. So I would challenge them to find me a video clip of a 'shrill' or 'ruthless' Hillary. Find me an interview in which Hillary 'snarled' or showed 'contempt' for the regular folks.
A long time ago I was working on the back of an asphalt truck in Oklahoma. An old man came up to me as I was tamping a pot hole and with a jalapeño pepper in his hand said " young man if you hear one thing and see another...always believe what you see". Then he walked off.
AL - What happened to your excellent work on FISA? It was an order of magnitude better than anything else out there. And I would add far more valuable than Hardball-style Beltway speculation.
I am amazed that the right-wingers would start this nonsense. They have to know Cindy's history is a bit tarnished to say the least. I think they are counting on Obama's "class" to not bring up these pesky little facts largely unknown to the public.
What amazes, & indeed, disturbs me most about Republican candidates' wives is that they all seem wedded ~ make that welded~ to fossilized notions of femininity circa 1961, the '50's or even earlier. So how long have women been in the workplace, getting educations every bit as impressive as a man's and competing in the "open" job market with one hand tied behind their backs? Um, I forget when I see someone like Laura Bush or Cindy McCain, dutifully & modestly staying in the background (or just cultivating the appearance of same ~ memories of the steel magnolia Nancy Reagan still haunt most American psyches).
EE-YEEW! To me, at least, as one of the women who chose a different course than the role of wilting flower, and whose conception of a real relationship is much more along the lines of what the Obamas seem to share, I really can't think of a clearer demarcation between what the parties stand for (from the feminine perspective).
All of Cindy's tragic and stereotypical poor-little-rich girl pathologies have been noted, as above--but enquiring minds also wanna know--how much plastic surgery has she had, and how much did it cost her? To me, that's the most illuminating question that goes to her character, or lack of same. She apparently sees herself as a construction of her own imagination and a dependent appendage.
I will give Laura Bush this on that score--she has the courage to be plain, like Pat Nixon with her good cloth coat.
So I'd like to see Michelle Obama compared to Cindy McCain if we're going to have to endure this "who'd make the better first lady" debate.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home