Friday, April 11, 2008

Going Too Far

While I don't blame the Clinton camp for trying to capitalize on Obama's poorly-considered remarks in San Francisco last week, this is going too far:

Clinton said she'd seen in the media that "my opponent said that the people of Pennsylvania who faced hard times are bitter."

"Well, that’s not my experience," she continued. "As I travel around Pennsylvania, I meet people who are resilient, who are optimistic, who are positive, who are rolling up their sleeves. They’re working hard every day for a better future for themselves and their children."

"Pennsylvanians don’t need a president who looks down on them. They need a president who stands up for them, who fights for them, who works hard for your futures, your jobs, and your families," she said, implicitly casting Obama as an elitist.
That's an incredibly reckless thing to say about the person who will, in all likelihood, end up being the Democratic nominee. There is no question that in the general election, Republicans will try to paint Obama as an elitist liberal snob who is out of touch with "regular people." This is what the GOP has tried to do--with considerable success--to every Democratic nominee in my lifetime. It's their favorite, most treasured line of attack. They'll do the same thing if Clinton is the nominee.

So to have as prominent a Democrat as Clinton go out of her way to reinforce that theme is incredibly damaging to the party, much more so than the remarks themselves.

When Rush Limbaugh and Hillary Clinton are engaged in the exact same kind of character attack, and it's directed at the likely Democratic nominee, then we have a real problem.
Digg!

10 Comments:

Blogger Drew M. said...

Senator Obama’s comments in response to the Clinton and McCain campaign’s attacks

I live at the poverty line and that clip gave me chills (the good kind). Guess that makes me a poor elitist and John McCain the multi-million dollar everyman.

11:13 PM  
Blogger jmcdonough120 said...

from swimming freestyle:

"Barack Obama is a remarkably eloquent man and turning into a remarkably capable politician. But if the Senator believes it's smart to insult voters from a state critical to your success, he's hit one of the worst false notes yet in his campaign.

Yeah, I know what his campaign said, and that may have been what he meant. But a sophisticated candidate doesn't refer to voters in language that can be construed as derogatory or insulting. Obama asserted Pennsylvania voters are bitter and so simple and lacking in maturity and intelligence that they address their frustration by clinging to primitive and reactionary crutches rather than addressing their problems in constructive ways.

It's divisive. And not the way to attract the voters you need most."

http://swimmingfreestyle.typepad.com

11:35 PM  
Anonymous Neo said...

When I posted about this yesterday, I had found the part ..
"anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."
.. as just breathe taking in regard to the fact that just the day before House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) had exercised the "nuclear option" and taken the Columbian Free Trade agreement out of contention for an up or down vote.

But why would Nancy Pelosi be bitter ?

But alas, here was the leading contender for the Democratic nomination for POTUS basically saying that this was a cynical act, probably a cynical political act which was not in the interest of the nation, but nonetheless standard House fare of the day.

Does Obama think that Pelosi and the House are cynical and/or bitter ? .. or is he just being reckless ?

I will watch and wait for an answer.

8:35 AM  
Blogger Quiddity said...

Agree on both points. Obama has gotten sloppy lately, talking about Pennsylvania while in California isn't good optics, especially when he comes off like a professor of sociology. But Clinton is hurting the Democrat brand here, which is odd, since if she had remained silent, she would have benefited just the same.

10:26 AM  
Blogger MLS said...

Apart from the fact that Obama’s remarks were “poorly-considered” (AL demonstrating the art of understatement), a couple of things interest me. First, the idea that people who are bitter cling to religion. This brings up something that occurred to me during the Reverend Wright controversy, but that I didn’t hear anyone raise (though no doubt someone somewhere must have). It seemed to me that Obama’s silence during Wright’s tirades may have signified less that he agreed or sympathized with the statements, and more that he had such little regard for the intelligence of his fellow parishioners that he was unsurprised and unconcerned that they would swallow these ideas. Perhaps that is what he expects from the “opiate of the masses.”

Second, the idea that the anti-immigrant policies of the Republican Party and anti-trade policies of the Democratic Party are very similar efforts to blame low-cost foreign competition for economic dislocations and to suggest, falsely, that America would be better off economically if this competition were eliminated. Here I think Obama is right on the money. But it strikes a jarring note because almost all politicians, including Obama, have signed up for at least one of these false ideas.

1:23 PM  
Blogger LongHairedWeirdo said...

I've been trying to spread this idea to bloggers I respect, because I think it's important (and, obviously, I think it's spot on).

The key to understanding Obama's comments is to recognize where he was with them. He was talking about how people *vote*, not how they live their lives. When you can't vote for your (literal) bread and butter issues, you find something else to vote for.

He's not saying "people are bitter, so they become religious or glom on to guns, or attack other folks".

He's saying they're pissed off that no one is paying attention to their jobs, so they cling to some other *voting strategy*, like guns, religion, immigration, or opposition (to gay rights, affirmative action, whatever).

No, it's not something where you can point to his words and say "there, see, that makes it clear". But if you look at the thrust of the message, he's saying he can win their votes because he's going to talk about bringing jobs back to their community.

9:55 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Didrex without a prescription
BUY CHEAP LORTAB

6:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Buy Adderall.adderall no prescription.adderall online
Buy Percocet.Percocet without prescription.percocet 30mg
Buy Lortab.lortab without prescription.buy lortab on line
PURCHASE CHEAP CIALIS ONLINE
Buy Xanax Without Prescription

11:51 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oxycontin online prescriptions
Oxycontin Online
Buy oxycontin online
Oxycontin without prescription
BUY OXYCONTIN

11:52 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Buy Meridia Without a Prescription
Buy cheap Levitra
Buy Meridia Online
Meridia online purchase
Meridia without prescription

11:53 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home