Giuliani's Views on Torture
(originally posted at Salon)
In his book, former Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin, described his experience being tortured by sleep deprivation at the hands of the KGB:
And given his outspoken belligerence regarding Iran, he must also find this pretty "silly" (from the State Department's official 2006 country report on Iran):
Here's what Giuliani told the Iowa crowd about our preferred form of mock execution, water-boarding:
In his book, former Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin, described his experience being tortured by sleep deprivation at the hands of the KGB:
In the head of the interrogated prisoner, a haze begins to form. His spirit is wearied to death, his legs are unsteady, and he has one sole desire: to sleep... Anyone who has experienced this desire knows that not even hunger and thirst are comparable with it.Here's U.S. presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani, speaking at a town hall event in Iowa yesterday:
I came across prisoners who signed what they were ordered to sign, only to get what the interrogator promised them.
He did not promise them their liberty; he did not promise them food to sate themselves. He promised them - if they signed - uninterrupted sleep! And, having signed, there was nothing in the world that could move them to risk again such nights and such days.
And I see, when the Democrats are talking about torture, they’re not just talking about even this definition of waterboarding, which again, if you look at the liberal media and you look at the way they describe it, you could say it was torture and you shouldn’t do it. But they talk about sleep deprivation. I mean, on that theory, I’m getting tortured running for president of the United States. That’s plain silly. That’s silly.Apparently, this is what it's like on the campaign trail:
Mr. Bashmilah was subjected to severe sleep deprivation and shackling in painful positions. Excruciatingly loud music was played twenty-four hours per day, seven days per week. Guards deprived him of sleep, routinely waking him every half hour. Initially, the cell was pitch black, his hands were cuffed together, and his legs were shackled together, severely restricting his movement and causing him pain. Later, he was chained to a wall and the light in his cell was left on at all times, except for brief moments when the guards came to his cell . . . . Mr. Bashmilah's psychological torment was such that he used a piece of metal to slash his wrists in an attempt to bleed to death. He used his own blood to write "I am innocent" and "this is unjust" on the walls of his cell.I wonder what Giuliani writes on the walls of his $4000 a night hotel rooms.
And given his outspoken belligerence regarding Iran, he must also find this pretty "silly" (from the State Department's official 2006 country report on Iran):
In recent years authorities have severely abused and tortured prisoners in a series of "unofficial" secret prisons and detention centers outside the national prison system. Common methods included prolonged solitary confinement with sensory deprivation . . . long confinement in contorted positions . . . threats of execution if individuals refused to confess . . . sleep deprivation.But these things can't be torture! We have memos saying they're just "enhanced interrogation techniques" fully consistent with U.S. and international law. Silly State Department.
Here's what Giuliani told the Iowa crowd about our preferred form of mock execution, water-boarding:
Questioner: “He [AG nominee Mukasey] said he didn’t know if waterboarding is torture.”You know we've come a long way as a country when the leading presidential candidate for the incumbent party suggests that perhaps one of the oldest, most iconic forms of torture known to man isn't torture at all, and we only think it is because we've been misled by our "liberal media." History, no doubt also has a well known liberal bias:
Giuliani: "Well, I’m not sure it is either. I’m not sure it is either. It depends on how it’s done. It depends on the circumstances. It depends on who does it. I think the way it’s been defined in the media, it shouldn’t be done. The way in which they have described it, particularly in the liberal media. So I would say, if that’s the description of it, then I can agree, that it shouldn’t be done. But I have to see what the real description of it is. Because I’ve learned something being in public life as long as I have. And I hate to shock anybody with this, but the newspapers don’t always describe it accurately.”
The first level of torture employed by the Spanish Inquisition was the "water cure." Water was poured into the accused's open mouth. The linen cloth was washed into the opening of the throat, preventing the accused from spitting the water back out. The overwhelming sensation of drowning forced the accused to swallow the water. The rules of torture as written by Torquemada, a man whom historians have compared to Hitler, stipulated that no more than eight liters of water could be used in a single session.Perhaps the most revealing part of Giuliani's response was his comment that whether waterboarding is torture "depends on who does it." That pretty much sums up the prevailing right-wing view on this issue: It's not torture when we do it. It's American exceptionalism taken to an absurd and frightening extreme. It doesn't matter that we draft detailed reports every year chastising all other countries in the world who are known to engage in this activity. It doesn't matter that we've prosecuted people in the past for war crimes for engaging in this same activity. Somehow acts that we would all agree are torture when committed by other countries cease to be torture when they are authorized by the U.S. government (but only for us; it's still torture if others do it). If anyone thinks that the United States' standing in the world will improve if Giuliani becomes president, they're sadly mistaken.



3 Comments:
"It doesn't matter that we draft detailed reports every year chastising all other countries in the world who are known to engage in this activity. It doesn't matter that we've prosecuted people in the past for war crimes for engaging in this same activity."
(1) Please identify each and every detailed report we have drafted chastising other countries for waterdoarding.
(2) Please identify each and every person we have prosecuted for war crimes for engaging in waterboarding.
neutral, there are state department reports issued every year for every country chronicling human rights abuses. I quoted the 2006 Iran report in this post. They routinely list things like sleep deprivation and holding people in stress positions (both of which are approved "enhanced interrogation techniques") as torture. You can go read them on the state department website. I'm not sure if any of them list waterboarding, mainly because it's not that common a torture technique these days.
As for number (2), we prosecuted a number of Japanese after WWII for waterboarding. And we even court martialed a number of U.S. soldiers for waterboarding during our occupation of the Philipenes in 1902.
"I'm not sure if any of them list waterboarding, mainly because it's not that common a torture technique these days."
But the question to Giuliani, the answer to which so inflamed you, was specifically about waterboarding. If you can cite me a state department report chastising any other country for waterboarding, please do so. Thus far you have failed.
And concerning point number (2), you're engaging in an impermissible stretch. True, we prosecuted a number of Japanese after WWII for torturing prisoners. It is also true that some of those prisoners were subject to the "water cure." Whether that activity, in and of itself, would have even given rise to a prosecution, let alone have been the basis of a conviction, is by no means clear. Those Japanese were prosecuted because they had committed depredations of the vilest sort imaginable, and the water board was a trifling incident to them.
You are also being far from straightforward in imputing to Giuliani the view that it's OK if Americans do it, unwarrantedly inferring that view from his unexceptional suggestion that "it depends on who does it." Nowhere did he suggest that it depended on whether it was an American or someone else. It is quite clear to me that he would regard it as unacceptable if done, say, by guards at Guantanamo seeking to pass the time by amusing themselves in this way and having no reasonable expectation of gaining actionable intelligence that might immediately save lives. Both he and I would think it was just ducky if it were done by trained professionals who did, indeed, have such a reasonable expectation. And while I don't agree with Professor Dershowitz about much, I believe that on this one he and I and Rudy are all in the same camp.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home