Libby to Jail
Scooter Libby has lost his appeal of Judge Walton's decision not to grant him bail pending his substantive appeal, meaning that, absent a pardon or some sort of commutation of his sentence by President Bush, he'll be headed to prison very shortly.
Because we all know how conservative pundits and politicians are going to react to this news, I just want to take a second to review how we got to this point.
This began with a criminal referral from the CIA (that hotbed of liberalism) to John Ashcroft's Justice Department. When Ashcroft (a Republican) recused himself from the case, his deputy James Comey (another Republican) appointed Patrick Fitzgerald (yet another Republican) to oversee the case. Though he likely could have secured indictments against a number of administration officials (including Karl Rove), Fitzgerald chose the conservative route and only indicted the person who had most obviously lied and obstructed the investigation, Scooter Libby. Refusing to plea, Libby hired all the best lawyers in Washington and took the case to trial, where a sympathetic jury nevertheless convicted him of four felony counts. He expressed no contrition following his conviction and was therefore sentenced by a Republican-appointed judge to a prison term well within existing sentencing guidelines (which are steep because Republicans want them that way). His request to remain free pending appeal was denied and that denial was confirmed unanimously by a three-judge panel consisting of two Republican-appointed judges.
Clearly this a partisan witch hunt.
Because we all know how conservative pundits and politicians are going to react to this news, I just want to take a second to review how we got to this point.
This began with a criminal referral from the CIA (that hotbed of liberalism) to John Ashcroft's Justice Department. When Ashcroft (a Republican) recused himself from the case, his deputy James Comey (another Republican) appointed Patrick Fitzgerald (yet another Republican) to oversee the case. Though he likely could have secured indictments against a number of administration officials (including Karl Rove), Fitzgerald chose the conservative route and only indicted the person who had most obviously lied and obstructed the investigation, Scooter Libby. Refusing to plea, Libby hired all the best lawyers in Washington and took the case to trial, where a sympathetic jury nevertheless convicted him of four felony counts. He expressed no contrition following his conviction and was therefore sentenced by a Republican-appointed judge to a prison term well within existing sentencing guidelines (which are steep because Republicans want them that way). His request to remain free pending appeal was denied and that denial was confirmed unanimously by a three-judge panel consisting of two Republican-appointed judges.
Clearly this a partisan witch hunt.



6 Comments:
I think it would be worth your time to list the crimes, due to the fed sentencing guidelines, which could land first time offenders in prison. I'm not talking about murder or bank robery, but the borderline crimes which, previously, judges would have had the discretion to sentence probation. Such as lighting a dumpster on fire:
http://www.hrw.org/reports/2001/prison/rodney_hulin.html
The reason I bring it up is because there was a 2001 study by Human Rights Watch which has been all but forgotten:
http://www.hrw.org/reports/2001/prison/
And which details what a young, white first offender can expect from our prison system. Ofcourse you don't HAVE to be young OR white to receive this welcome, but overwhelmingly, it's white kids who suffer the full weight of the brutality.
That being the case, and you being a lawyer, I'm wondering if you could possibly say that you've seved the interest of your young client and his family if you advise anything OTHER than getting your son the hell out of the country- should he be accused of some minor crime (and is knowingly guilty).
As a lawyer, what are the penalties for recommending this course of action or turning a blind eye to it?
I wonder if the congressmen who were responsible for the fed guidelines have ever read the report? Or their constituents?
Who is willing to give odds on pardon/commutation?
Will Bush pardon Libby, or equivalently play some trick to keep him out of jail until the end of Bush's term and he can be pardoned after the election of 2008,
or
Will Bush follow his own guidelines for pardons and let Libby rot in jail until after the election?
My bet (and I'll give 2 to 1 on it) is that he'll pardon, because he can't afford to lose any more of his most ardent and abject supporters. If he loses a bunch of the few remaining self-delusional fools who still cling to his presidency as a matter of principle, so what?
Any takers?
Libby is hosed today. Yes, the outcry for "Free Scooter" by the Libby supporters are coming. And the talks of a possible Libby pardon will be polluted all over the media. There is still two main officials that still haven't been charged in the leak investigation: Dick Cheney and Karl Rove. And sure Bush can pardon Libby (the small fish out of the group). Of course, Rove have more crimes than just the leak investigation. King George can do what he wants. Regardless of whatever Bush's decision is, Bush's presidency is finished.
Bush commutes Libby prison sentence
"WASHINGTON - President Bush commuted the sentence of former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby on Monday, sparing him from a 2 1/2-year prison term that Bush said was excessive. "
Guess again.
Bush has commuted Libby's sentence.
Scooter is still a convicted felon, but he will suffer no consequences for his crimes.
A.L.,
So what did I win? Bush probably lost another 3-4 percentage points, the support of another few senators, and has effectively ended his presidency as an effective force.
Good riddance.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home