Time to Impeach Gonzales
An article in Thursday's New York Times officially confirms that at least one more U.S. Attorney, Todd Graves of Missouri, was forced out of office last year by the Bush administration. What did Graves do to warrant dismissal? Well, much like his colleagues, it appears Graves was unwilling to initiate meritless lawsuits and prosecutions solely to enhance the election prospects of Republican candidates. According to the Times:
How many more stories like this need to surface before people stop claiming that there is nothing rotten in the Department of Justice? There is a clear and unmistakable pattern here of improper political interference with prosecutorial decision-making. Gonzales has allowed the DOJ to be used as a political arm of the White House. He has allowed federal prosecutors to be intimidated, bullied, and even fired for refusing to cast aside their independent prosecutorial judgment, for refusing to engage in meritless partisan witch hunts or choosing to pursue meritorious prosecutions against Republican officials. That is entirely unacceptable in a free society, and it is grounds for impeachment.
Lest there be any doubt about that, I suggest reading this post by Marty Lederman which discusses Gonzales secret order delegating enormous discretion over the hiring and firing of DOJ personnel to Kyle Sampson and Monica Goodling. In short, Gonzales publicly revoked the authority that had traditionally belonged to the Deputy Attorney General and Associate Attorney General and, at least publicly, reclaimed that authority for himself. He then issued a secret follow up order re-delegating that same authority to Sampson and Goodling. This second order was apparently so secret that even the Deputy Attorney General, the person who used to have this authority, was not informed of it. As Marty explains:
In one case, Mr. Graves said, the civil rights division had wanted him to sue the State of Missouri for what federal officials thought was its failure to purge voter registration roles of people who had died, changed addresses or left the state.Graves was right. The case was quickly dismissed.
Mr. Graves said he believed the suit would not succeed because local governments are responsible for registration records. After his refusal to sign off, the lawsuit was authorized by Bradley J. Schlozman, then the acting chief in the civil rights division in Washington. The department named Mr. Schlozman as Mr. Graves’s interim successor.
Mr. Graves said he might also have alienated officials in Washington by giving Claire McCaskill, a Democrat who has since been elected to the United States Senate from Missouri, a letter in 2004 saying there had been insufficient evidence to file charges in a case from the 1990s that involved her office manager. Last year, Ms. McCaskill unseated Jim Talent, a Republican.Apparently the White House didn't like the fact that Graves had confirmed there was no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of a McCaskill staffer. After all, it would have been much easier to smear McCaskill had the facts remained a little more murky.
Mr. Graves said that in retrospect, he might have been seen as too independent and unwilling to push causes important to the Republican Party unless he felt action was merited by his reading of the law.
How many more stories like this need to surface before people stop claiming that there is nothing rotten in the Department of Justice? There is a clear and unmistakable pattern here of improper political interference with prosecutorial decision-making. Gonzales has allowed the DOJ to be used as a political arm of the White House. He has allowed federal prosecutors to be intimidated, bullied, and even fired for refusing to cast aside their independent prosecutorial judgment, for refusing to engage in meritless partisan witch hunts or choosing to pursue meritorious prosecutions against Republican officials. That is entirely unacceptable in a free society, and it is grounds for impeachment.
Lest there be any doubt about that, I suggest reading this post by Marty Lederman which discusses Gonzales secret order delegating enormous discretion over the hiring and firing of DOJ personnel to Kyle Sampson and Monica Goodling. In short, Gonzales publicly revoked the authority that had traditionally belonged to the Deputy Attorney General and Associate Attorney General and, at least publicly, reclaimed that authority for himself. He then issued a secret follow up order re-delegating that same authority to Sampson and Goodling. This second order was apparently so secret that even the Deputy Attorney General, the person who used to have this authority, was not informed of it. As Marty explains:
The problem here is that this important function has now been delegated to persons having virtually no tie to the cadre of professionals in the Department -- young attorneys who had no background, experience or qualification to evaluate candidates for senior law enforcement positions except their political connections and loyalty to the White House. But the fact that the DAG's traditional responsibility was transferred lock, stock and barrel to these two people, of all the officials in the Department, makes clear that the only relevant considerations for hiring were to be partisan political considerations, not performance.This was clearly done in order to allow the White House to have complete control over the hiring and firing of Justice Department officials. It was a nakedly political move (hence the secrecy). There is no question that under Gonzales' stewardship, the Justice Department has become politicized to a degree that cannot be tolerated in a society that purports to value the rule of law and the impartial administration of justice. Gonzales must go. Immediately. And if he doesn't resign, he should be impeached. We need to have an Attorney General who at least has some minimal amount of integrity and independent judgment. Gonzales is not that man.



6 Comments:
"Judicial Watchdog Demands Commission on AG Alberto Gonzales Promotion of Bradley Schlozman After Schlozman’s Voting Rights Act Violations
David Price of IFFOC called for Truth and Reconciliation Commission over former US Attorney Bradley J. Schlozman’s Voting Rights Act violations in Kansas and Missouri.
Topeka, KS. 5-10-2007 David Price, founder of Independent Federal Fund Oversight Committee (IFFOC) called today for US Attorney Alberto Gonzales to make US Attorneys and Assistant US Attorneys available nationwide for a Truth and Reconciliation Commission and town hall meetings to address main Justice’s involvement in violations of The Voting Rights Act of 1965, Section 2, 42 U.S.C. § 1973.
Along with the United States Attorney for the District of Kansas Eric F. Melgren, the former US Attorney for Missouri Bradley J. Schlozman brought the most voter fraud indictments. It has now been revealed the voter fraud defendants targeted by Melgren and Schlozman were part of a nationwide conspiracy coordinated by Bradley J. Schlozman to ignore civil rights violations and selectively prosecute Democrat get out the vote drives in minority and socially disadvantaged neighborhoods. The goal of the plan executed by Melgren and Schlozman was to bring vote fraud allegations just five days before the elections in Missouri, the state with the closest US Senate race to save Republican Jim Talent from being defeated by Claire McCaskill and in Kansas to build on Bradley J. Schlozman’s work with officials in several states that included Missouri, Georgia and Arizona to impose voter I.D. legislation known to reduce election participation by African Americans, Hispanics and American Indians believed to vote predominately for Democrat candidates.
On April 26, 2007 US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales promoted Bradley J. Schlozman to the Executive Office for United States Attorneys where he will be able to control career Department of Justice attorneys across the nation. Under the threat of firings and smear campaigns from main Justice, US Attorneys are no longer free to exercise their own legal judgment in the conduct of their offices. The United States Attorney for the District of Kansas Eric F. Melgren was not targeted but had to demonstrate his loyalty. Melgran’s office caused City of Topeka police instead of US Marshalls to serve a summons for a May 20th, 2004 deposition to Rosemary Price a witness in the Kansas District Court civil rights case Melvin E. Johnson v. John E. Potter, USPS No. 01-CV-4182-SAC on May 26th, six days after Rosemary Price appeared and testified as scheduled. The police threatened to shoot Rosemary Price’s dog if she did not open the door.
Eric F. Melgran’s office caused the summons to be served knowing Rosemary Price had attended the deposition because Johnson’s lawyer had warned Melgran’s Assistant US Attorney D. Brad Bailey that Melgran’s office needed to stop suborning obstruction of justice through intimidation and retaliation against witnesses coming to give testimony in Kansas District court, calling Assistant US Attorney D. Brad Bailey’s his attention to federal and state officials taking retaliatory actions against the African American Kansas national guardsman Mark Hunt and the plaintiff Melvin Johnson for appearing in U.S. District Judge Julie Robinson’s courtroom to give testimony against the City of Topeka and misconduct of City of Topeka police officers in Kansans for the Separation of School and State v. Adams, Ks Dist. Ct. Case No. 04-cv-04034-JAR-KGS on May 3, 2004.
Bradley J. Schlozman worked with Tim Griffin, now US attorney for Arkansas and Karl Rove to misuse voting law enforcement to challenge the votes of African American soldiers deployed overseas and to develop the caging lists of 70,000 names and addresses of voters in largely African-American and Democratic areas of Florida during the 2004 election. The Justice Department refuses to identify the officials that added U.S. Attorney David Iglesias, of New Mexico to the list of US Attorneys to be targeted because Iglesias was refusing to bring pretext voter fraud indictments to interfere with Democrat voting by Hispanic and American Indian minorities. Both Bradley J. Schlozman and Tim Griffin were installed as US Attorneys under an unconstitutional use of the USA PATRIOT Act.
As head of the Civil Rights Division at USDOJ, Bradley J. Schlozman tried to implement a barrier to minorities voting in Georgia, the 2005 Georgia voter I.D. law that a federal judge compared to a Jim Crow-era poll tax. During his work in Georgia, Bradley J. Schlozman made connections with state lawmakers benefiting from reduced African American voting and was able to build for them the high level relationships that gave them protection from USDOJ law enforcement, including the False Claims Act investigation of Georgia GOP state representative David E. Ralston. US Attorney David Nahmias for Georgia and Assistant US Attorney Laura Kennedy Bomamder declined to prosecute the case even though the IRS filed tax liens against Rep. David E. Ralston for the false claims revealed by the complaint.
As U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Missouri Bradly J. Schlozman obtained search warrants in September 2006 which the FBI would use to raid the home of Columbia, Missouri businessman and Muslim philanthropist Shakir Hamoodi to attempt to help Jim Talent’s reelection campaign by appearing to be fighting terrorism, even though Hamoodi is not involved in terrorism and only was a member of an ethnic group Schlozman thought Missouri voters would believe was a terrorist.
Bradley J. Schlozman used his previous position in main Justice to improperly screen new hires on political party affiliations. Schlozman also changed the job performance evaluations of career civil servant attorneys including Tobey More a geographical analyst in Schlozman’s section in retaliation for not supporting Karl Rove’s voting suppression policies. Eric F. Melgran’s Assistant US Attorney D. Brad Bailey was able to use a threat of Justice Department prosecution in May 2004 against Melvin Johnson’s attorney if Johnson’s attorney made a criminal complaint regarding the intimidation of witnesses with testimony against the City of Topeka. The State of Kansas is now bringing an ethics prosecution against a second private attorney who brought out evidence of the City of Topeka’s corrupt misuse of Housing and Urban Development funds as well as Tax Increment Financing (“TIF”) funds in Topeka’s minority neighborhoods.
The promotion of Bradley J. Schlozman to main Justice where he can continue to misuse his office to obstruct justice in voting rights investigations and assist Karl Rove in preventing public corruption from being prosecuted gives American citizens the impression that this has become the policy of the US Department of Justice. Already since Bradley J. Schlozman’s return to Washington D.C., main justice has started to employ the tactics pioneered in Kansas, the smearing of honest attorneys and the use of a Justice Department Ethics prosecution against Monica Goodling to intimidate her despite Congress’s grant of immunity to testify fully and freely on the retaliatory firings of US Attorneys.
“Our nation cannot go through what we lived through here in Kansas, a Republican Attorney General, Phil Kline receiving the benefit of dollars from out of state corporations for refusing to enforce laws to protect consumers. A department Phil Kline entrusted to a conservative party operative attorney Bryan Brown despite Brown’s arrests and sanctions for misconduct. With the promotion of Bradley J. Schlozman we are seeing the US Department of Justice taking the same wrong turn. Its time for Alberto Gonzales to fire Bradley J. Schlozman and for all US attorneys and Assistants to come forward in every community and tell the truth of what happened so our nation can start to heal” said David Price."
Judicial Watchdog Demands Commission On Ag Alberto Gonzales Promotion Of Bradley Schlozman After Schlozman’s Voting Rights Act Violations
All good points - but isn't it really the chimp that has to go?
Who would they get to replace him? Another AG who would "allow the White House to have complete control over the hiring and firing of Justice Department officials", would not get past the confirmation process. Anyone with independence would not be nominated in the first place. Anyone with integrity would not take the position.
In the first place, the end user is screwed here (and more would leave comments if fixed) at this irritating script I have to input for verification. Not funny, man, I often can't see what the fuck the letters are and my comment is barfed.
Sorry to be blunt, I lose patience with this unthinking insult to the end user, fucking coders are nothing without us. Be the web, live the web, think in the web, it's easy.
Now then, my good attorney, friend of the court and sincere jurist, I find this insistence on the rule of the law to be...be...exasperating, god damn it, the rule of law was totally obliterated in Bush vs. Gore. Gonzoed, blasted, torpedoed, shit upon and flushed.
Ever since 90% of Americans walk around in total denial about it. Just as they are to the incredible horrors inflicted upon the people of Iraq.
I understand, motherfucker, I really do, what you mean, who you are and why you behave toward the law. I respect it. At the same screaming god damn time I refuse to be suckered, I loathe those who openly screw me and us in total defiance of the law and pay no penalty. For so many of us, often those with the greatest power, there is no rule of law.
How may of our young people rot in prison from our further perverse whoring to this abstract idea, this thing you call law? Know why there are so many more women in college than men these days? It's not because we do something wrong in school. It's because we horribly abuse our young men and then throw the most troubled in prison.
I'm suckered and abused every day I walk this sham of a country by playing by the rules, this thing called the law. I resent and I refuse to be bullshitted in some blog post about what me must do when we lost it all seven years ago.
[shakes head] Stay well, Al. You're a great guy but there ain't no fucking law here. It's not working. It's nothing personal, man, it who I am, if Jesus Christ or Al Gore had wrote it I'd react the same way.
{ I just missed the first word try, too, now a granny version has appeared. I don't want to feel old when I come here either, for the love of jesus and mary take pity of your precious end users }
A graduate of law school myself, I agree wholeheartedly & have been ranting nonstop since the scandal first broke.
I think (hope) it's Bush's Watergate! We're well overdue for a Neocon Nation housecleaning! If the Congress critters grow some, there should be subpoenas flying & heads on blocks really, really soon.
Bushco has conducted a sustained assault on & perversion of the rule of law in everything (domestic spying, the Geneva Conventions, rendition, torture ~) but hopefully this is the final insult not to be borne.
The great German theologian Dorothy Soelle coined a term that is applicable to this Administration and the seedy lap dogs it appoints . . . Soelle would see this as an Administration of "Christofacists". . .
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home