Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Expectations Met and Surpassed

My goodness. I'd forgotten what it feels like to be pleased by national election results. I don't think the Democrats could have asked for much more out of this election. They've taken over the House (with considerable room to spare), and if a few tight Senate races continue to break their way, they may take over the Senate, too. Either way, that's HUGE. The Republican Party will try to spin this in any number of ways, but there's just no getting around the fact that this is a stunning and historically significant rebuke of a sitting President and his party. And it couldn't have been more well-deserved.

It's going to take me some time to soak it all in, but for the moment I'm just going to enjoy it. More to come . . .

UPDATE: The Montana and Virginia Senate races are looking pretty good at this point. It's looking like the Democrats drew the inside straight they needed to take the Senate.

And their odds of holding that majority look pretty good. In a post at Tapped, Mark Schmitt fleshes out what I was thinking this morning on my way to work: the Democrats will be in prime shape to build on their Senate majority in '08.
There are 12 Democrats, and 21 Republicans [coming up for re-election in '08]. Of the Dems, the only likely retirees would be Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey (the GOP just took its last best shot at a NJ Senate seat), perhaps John Kerry, and perhaps Biden if he gives up his seat to run for president, which if he asked me, I would advise against. The only vulnerable Dem in the class is Mary Landrieu of Louisiana.

Of the 21 Republicans, on the other hand, there are a few likely retirements: John Warner, Pete Domenici, and Ted Stevens, from Virginia, New Mexico, and Alaska respectively. The first two states are trending seriously Democratic, the third always has possibilities. (Plus, Mark Warner might run for the John Warner seat, and would be unbeatable.) Then there's Wayne Allard in Colorado, Norm Coleman in Minnesota, Gordon Smith in Oregon, and John Sununu in New Hampshire, whose two congressional districts just went Democratic. A decent candidate could take any of those bluer-by-the-day states. And then there's a third tier of Senators up in 2008 which includes Mike Enzi in Wyoming, James Inhofe in Oklahoma, and Pat Roberts in Kansas, who are probably not vulnerable in ordinary terms, but in each of those states there is an extremely popular governor who won reelection tonight -- Dave Freudenthal, Brad Henry, and Kathleen Sebelius. Any of them would start out as very strong Senate candidates.

That's seven possible pick-ups in 2008, plus three more that could be picked up with the right candidate. And what if Harold Ford runs against Lamar Alexander in Tennessee? What if Susan Collins in Maine draws a strong opponent? What about Elizabeth Dole, whose image of competence is as shattered as Dick Cheney's? That's thirteen seats the Republicans have to worry about either a little or a lot. And almost no potential for gains.

If the Democrats handle the next two years well, they could have 56 or more seats in the Senate when the next president takes office.
Digg!

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am going to enjoy listening Lush Bimbo squealing like the pig that he is. Nothing on his site yet.....Sean Hannity too. Bwaaaaaa

8:43 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Better yet - hear what the chimperor has to say - time to put the "leaders" of this criminal gang under oath!!!!

9:31 AM  
Anonymous Brandon M said...

keep in mind, Rush whining about the majority dems in the house is what he does best.

Apparently he's good at it.

9:32 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What the heck is keeping the media from calling the Montana Senate race for the Dems? The only county still to report in Montana is Meagher County (since 5 this morning--HELLO, it's 10 a.m.!). Meagher County has a little over 1900 residents. The difference between Tester and Burns is a little over 1700 votes. Unless Meagher County votes 90% for Burns (assuming EVERY resident is a registered voter), Tester has won. Something is going on behind the scenes that is keeping this announcement suppressed.

11:47 AM  
Blogger A.L. said...

Something is going on behind the scenes that is keeping this announcement suppressed.

I wouldn't get paranoid yet. I think they're waiting on some absentee and provisional ballots too.

12:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Don't be fools, gang - repugs have TOO MUCH TO HIDE in terms of dirty tricks and vote fraud. NO WAY THEY CHALLENGE THESE SEATS!

It will just open up other cans of worms - don't kid yourself - we did not have an "honest" election, just one that was overwhelming enough that it could not be stolen.

11:03 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home