The Onion on Executive Power
The latest headline at the Onion reads, "Bush Grants Self Permission To Grant More Power To Self":
The Presidential Empowerment Act, which the presidentAnd the best line:
hand-drafted on his own Oval Office stationery and promptly
signed into law, provides Bush with full authority to permit
himself to authorize increased jurisdiction over the three
branches of the federal government, provided that the
president considers it in his best interest to do so.
"In a time of war, the president must have the power he
needs to make the tough decisions, including, if need be,
the decision to grant himself even more power," Bush said.
"To do otherwise would be playing into the hands of our
enemies." . . .
Despite the president's new powers, the role of Congress
and the Supreme Court has not been overlooked. Under the
new law, both enjoy the newly broadened ability to grant the
president the authority to increase his presidential powers.
In addition, Republicans fearful that the president's new(h/t Andrew Sullivan)
power undermines their ability to grant him power have
proposed a new law that would allow senators to permit him
to grant himself power, with or without presidential approval.



5 Comments:
Is it SATIRE if it's TRUE?
I do not know Andrew Sullivan, not in the least, and I have never read any of his work. A long, long time ago I became familiar with his hackery thorugh liberal blogs, especially Atrios.
I respect the fact that you like him, otherwise I would instantly find him horribly repulsive in the extreme.
But this, as I say, is a perception from liberal blogs, not one I'm willing to trust entirely. Still, I find mention of him unsettling for reasons I cannot fully explain. Very evil times are upon us and Andrew cheered them along as much as he could, I simply don't give a shit about his admissions once disater was and is upon us. Perhaps that's it.
I'll think about this.
Paradox,
This is totally subjective, but Sullivan may have done more than any other blogger to convince people that Bush is at fault for U.S. torture policies and that those policies are immoral and destructive.
Other bloggers like Marty Lederman have written about it more, but they don't have the readership Sullivan does, particularly among hawks. He's the reason executive power became such a big issue for me, and I suspect I'm not alone.
Sullivan should also get credit for championing gay marriage "before it was cool." He got a lot of attacks from the left for that in the '80's, if I remember correctly.
So he isn't even close to all bad. At the very least, he's worlds better than the National Review, and I think he does significantly more good than harm.
Paradox,
I just wanted to add one more thing. While I disagree with your assessment of Sullivan, I want to commend you for your candor in admitting that you hadn't read his work and that you were a bit uncomfortable with your reaction to him. It can take a lot of courage to advertise one's own uncertainty, and I really respect your thoughtfulness.
Take care,
Gotta love the Onion. But Bamage is right, this one isn't satire so much as the headline I expect to read soon one morning in the paper.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home